‘Against Innocence’ Jackie Wang http://www.liesjournal.net/volume1-10-againstinnocence.html
‘Hot Allostatic Load’ by Porpentine (2015) http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/hot-allostatic-load/
Housing, welfare and the Return to Family @ Queer Provocations (2016)
Women’s Day and the Feminist 5 a year on – Chuang (2016)
The WOW factor: Wollongong’s unemployed and the dispossession of class and history, Nick Southall
Radical-Wollongong-Late-1970s-and-1980s-Chapter-DRAFT (Histories of class struggle in Wollongong)
The Economy of Abolition/Abolition of the Economy Marina Vishmidt & Neil Gray (A critique of communisation theory)
Should wives be shared or rationed? Datu (2015)
Further comments on organisation (an argument about contemporary struggle that critiques communisation, and argues for a different perspective that is very much grounded in the global organisation of labour and also resistance)
Honour this sistagirl: stop transphobic and racist deaths in custody, Alison Thorne (about Veronica Baxter’s murder in custody)
FIRST STUTTERINS OF“PRECARIAS A LA DERIVA”, Precarias a la Deriva (Spanish collective interested in struggles around care and domestic labour, thoughtful about how collective organising in these areas can and does occur)
Andrea 366 Beyond the pros and cons of trigger warnings: collectivizing healing 2014
Silvia Federici and Massimo De Angelis on the political ecology of the commons (This interview asks: 1) What do commons mean from a leftist feminist perspective? 2) How can we clarify the definition of commons in order to not be coopted by mainstream discourses on commons? and 3) How can this definition be linked to ecology?)
After the Fall; Communiques from Occupied California (The Necrosocial; Civic Life, Social Death, and the UC is a fairly short, but badass article which calls into question the meaning of identity and radicalism within the confines of capital and its university. See p.14-15 from the link embedded in the title.)
Many excellent texts and videos can also be found here: https://caringlabor.wordpress.com/
An excerpt from “the materialisation of race”:
“What multiculturalism promised, then, was recognition (and rights) as the reward for appropriate expressions of difference – which is to say, both appropriate and appropriable: differences that can be appropriated as property; competition as the proper expression of difference (or conflict); relation conceived entirely in the register of exchange. Multiculturalism is, in other words, a particularly contractual version of the promise, not an assurance that the state or its institutions will recognise differences so much as a transaction over which differences will not disturb the social ordering (and valuations) of difference. And so, just as disturbance remains, so too does the need to racialise its features.”